The Mountain Parade / Tamara Parsons-Baker / King of Cats @ The Wheatsheaf, Oxford, 30/09/2009

Posh is the new Black. Witness the puerile, catastrophic decision by Labour activists to dress up and parade around as Lord Snooty at the Crewe and Nantwich by-election last year, effectively trebling the Conservative majority. Karl Marx and Arthur Scargill could have told them wearily: class war doesn’t cut it in England.

Which is good news for all of the acts on tonight’s bill, as there are plenty of cut-glass accents on display, and in one case, a charming haziness about where the M40 leads (“Oh, somewhere in the North”). I’m not sure any of the acts would be totally at home in King Tut’s Wah Wah Hut in Glasgow, but fortunately we’re at the Wheatsheaf, with most of the audience sat expectantly on the floor, as if they’re waiting on the latest instalment of Prince Caspian from a fluffy primary school teacher.

First up is a nervous, spectacled, studenty singer-songwriter called Max, who performs as King of Cats. But he has an ace in the hole: a second microphone hooked up to a ring oscillator, which turns his gentle, slightly effete singing voice into a Clanger-ish hoot. He is comically unable to control the pitch, but who cares when you’re getting Big Laughs? Every time you do it!

As a songwriter, his style reminds me a little of the short-story writer Saki: there’s a vein of misanthropy and waspishness lurking under the studious John Major mildness:

“Replace a wife with a dog. You don’t need to listen to what a Labrador says”

The King hooks up profitably on one song with the Queen of the Mountain Parade, Roxy, and I’d like to hear more of this, as the sound they get, while retaining simplicity, is deeper and sweeter than when he plays on his own. Altogether, the set was a nervous, eccentric triumph, with at least two promoters in the audience keen to book him.

Tamara Parsons-Baker has caused a certain amount of spilled ink on this website recently, due to a middling review of her debut demo a month ago. Tonight’s performance was equally divisive, with one scenester whom I respect snorting about ‘standard singer-songwriter fare’. I quite enjoyed the set, but I’m not sure that solo performance is really her medium.

First thing is to say is that Parsons-Baker’s voice is superb. She is not one for dull naturalism, performing with a restless, operatic delivery, at times almost hectoring, at others glassily pure. It’s almost as if she isn’t a singer-songwriter at all, but rather a Grace Slick rock chick awaiting the backing band of her dreams. The acoustic guitar, played perfectly effectively on numbers like ‘To Possess”, is sometimes almost inadequate as a foil for her stormy vocal rhetoric.

Her lyrics are like mines in a meadow. For the most part, they are pleasant but unmemorable but then some neuronal explosion gives us the vision of some insane poet (must be Swinburne- he was a total nutter) “stabbing a be-titted figurine in the groin with a pin”. Now either this is the worst line ever written, or a breath-taking work of staggering genius. Whatever it is, it has no place in the repertoire of a nice, well brought up singer-songwriter. Which is why we’ll keep watching her.

Finally, to The Mountain Parade, our favourite octet of work-shy English students, purveying heavenly little nuggets of Belle and Sebastian feyness, held together loosely by their new drummer, and singer Roxy’s all-conquering niceness. Although they still need to do a whip-round for a tuner, they are considerably tighter than the amiable duffers who turned up at last year’s Winter Warmer, and the songs seem more substantial than before, with their paean to fictional explorer Shackleton Beaulieux a singalong standout. The band, a jazzy gaggle of trumpeters, ukulelists (sp?), fiddlers and cellists have learnt the art of playing sympathetically behind a frontwoman with a very small voice (what she lacks in decibels, she makes up for in charm and bonhomie)-this is one of the hardest things to do when there are so many of you, so plaudits all round. I’d like to hear the cellist play a bit lower and a bit louder, as the whole thing is a bit top-heavy, but the fact is that when you leave a Mountain Parade gig, you feel that the world is a slightly sweeter place than when you came in. They’re playing with We Aeronauts at the Sunday Roast later in the month. Though I pity the soundman, that’s going to be a hot ticket.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    “Most of the audience sat expectantly on the floor, as if they’re waiting on the latest instalment of Prince Caspian from a fluffy primary school teacher.”

    That. Is. Perfect.

  • Oliver

    Re: Tamara Parsons-Baker

    While it isn’t easy to understand what Colin is attempting to say in between all the fluffed up ‘creative writing’ rubbish taught on degree courses from two bit former polys, he does make two important points:

    1) She has a superb voice and
    2) Keep watching this amazing musician.

    Plus King of Cats cracked me up big time – great set!!

  • colinmackinnon

    Jeez, these Tamara fans like a ruck!

  • carol

    Those who can — do. T hose who can’t – are critics!

    Keep the creative waters flowing Tamara with your ‘SUPERB’ voice and songs.

  • http://myspace.com/huckmusic Huck

    We Tamara fans are hardcore and will be there in force when she plays Baby Simple this Thursday.

    GO T-BONE

  • another matt

    jesus, i’ve never heard tamara parsons baker but the response from her ‘fans’ puts me right off listening…

  • http://myspace.com/huckmusic Huck

    ” ‘ fans ‘ “

  • dan

    @another matt…

    How can a fan whose passionate about a performer put you off.

    I’m not a particularly huge fan of Tamara but I’d have to say that if I’d never heard from her great reviews from her fans would tempt me to listen a lot more than some wanna be journalist, writing an amature column on a free site, especially when he’s gone to a night and has pretty much nothing all that good to say about any of the acts.

  • Henry

    I enjoyed this review of the night on Wednesday and it’s brilliant that it comes on a ‘free site’ – otherwise we’d have to pay.. I am a fan of Tamara and I quite like the idea of her lyrics being like “mines in meadow”. What more could you want? All this criticism of the critic is quite funny – “Fearing not that I’d become my enemy / In the instant that I preach.”[!] I thought the night was quite subdued overall and it’s a better venue for bands, I think – though I’m no critic..

    I enjoyed King of Cats – felt if the set was tighter his understated, contemplative and just plain funny lyrics would have been better served. I also found myself laughing at the Grace Slick reference..I think there may be more parallels to be drawn there! By the way I think it’s a Roman poet and not Swinburne – but not entirely sure..

    Look forward to the gig in Baby Simple on Thursday and then the big one on the 24th October at the Isis Tavern. Zan Lyons and Yo Zushi are playing too! http://www.londonpoetrysystems.com/LPS/Events.html

    Thanks for an entertaining review
    from one of the more moderate – though still passionate – Tamara fans!

    yr svt

    h

  • A C Ritic

    A good voice and good songs will always outlast a ‘fluffy’ matt who does not want to listen and ‘how many creative words one can put in a sentence’ journalism.

    Tallyho – Keep on Jamming

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    If Tamara ever actrually gets a bad review you lot will probably explode.

    I was at this gig, & I thoroughly enjoyed it – all 3 acts playe d abtter set than I’d previously seen, which is lovely to see – but I think Colin’s review is very reasonable (except for his obsessive desire to fly his Tory flag in the 1st paragraph).

    I also think that if there’s one person in this town for whom the nickname “T-BONE” is less fitting, it’s Tamara. I think you should call her TamPaBa – it sounds like a fanfare.

  • colinmackinnon

    In the interests of political balance (we’re not the BBC, so these things matter to us!), I should point out that Labour doesn’t have a monopoly on obnoxious activists (remember the Tory ‘Hang Mandela’ crowd a few years back?).

    Anyway I love Tamara’s crazy fans- keep them coming, folks! The great lady herself seems very happy with the write-up, as she’s posted it on her Myspace page.

  • Mark

    “With one scenester whom I respect snorting about ’standard singer-songwriter fare”

    Haha I may know this ‘scenester’ you speak of…shall I repeat his, or hers name and let Tamara’s fans loose???

    Nice one on the review Colin and good to see you and Rich at the gig the other night.
    Twas a pleasant night. I also feel Tamara would suit the backing of a band to take her music in a slightly different direction as she has a distinctly strong voice to set her apart as well as some interesting lyrics, though the music currently sides on generic woman singer song writer with a guitar. This is my attempt at constructive feedback, I did book her to play after all…

  • Beaver Fuel

    It makes me laugh that people bitch about writing styles on an amature (sic) site – it’s really not that different to what we read in the national press, so what is the difference? Let’s get one thing straight: Journalism is always more about the writer than the subject. As soon as we understand that we can get everything into some kind of context. Besides, if one person’s opinion is so worthless why do so many people get their knickers in a twist about it?

  • Phill

    I don’t get it. I thought she got a good review yet people still complained about it.

    Also, aren’t all music websites that have reviews “free”? If you don’t understand Colin’s review because of his so called “fluffy, creative writing” then I think you need to get an education.

  • Beaver Fuel

    Phill has inadvertently made a point there: If you can’t understand Colin’s writing, how do you stand a chance with making sense of song lyrics? They are frequently more vague and obscure than any reviewer’s output. Or doesn’t anyone listen to the words if the face is pretty enough…?

  • Henry

    The face that launched a thosand comments.. but isn’t it the edgy content of the songs and complex tone as well as the interesting voice that make Tamara stand out from this abstract concept of standard, female singer songwriter fare? I’d like to call into question the authority of this anonymous “scenester”.. Some soundhall deus(a) ex machina, whose apostles dispense justice and teaching about standard singer songwriters. How bored must you be only to see things only in relation to chucks of ‘standardness’. I’ve got an image of a depressive Jaba the Hut surrounded by a gaggle of singer songwriters vying for his praise and appetite. I think it’s the ‘fare’ that does it.. Even Phill the incredulous will agree with me, I hope, that this kind of itunes approach of bracketing musicians doesn’t really help anyone get a better picture of the act, which I’m taking as one aim of the critic. That’s why Collin’s review was good because he listened – perhaps that’s what scenesters don’t do.. Actually what is a scenester? Is it something to which I should aspire? Or is aspiration all you need?

  • colinmackinnon

    Henry: your comments are very funny- if you ever fancy contributing as a reviewer give me a bell!

    Actually, the word scenester is a bit scary and horrible: I guess I just meant people that regularly go to gigs, contribute to gigs, promote them, take photos, play in bands…basically someone who doesn’t just show up once and then disappear. So it’s a broad church.

  • phill

    I only partly agree with you Henry the pugnacious. Yes, it’s lazy to pigeon hole acts into genres, and maybe it is, but isn’t it the job of the artist to challenge that? You say it “doesn’t really help anyone get a better picture of the act” but, primarily, that’s the job of the artist, not the reviewer.

  • Henry

    Interesting point. I think it’s the artist’s job to perform; the viewer’s job to view and the reviewer’s job (as well as to promote, pass judgement and entertain) – at some level – to fill out the context in which the artist is performing – to occupy the space between the audience and the artist, so that the artist doesn’t have to condescend to an audience’s variously informed and variously influenced body of experience, but is free to simply do what they do. This might just rattle a few bones, but..

    the way I see it is that reviewing is of course secondary to the performer’s act, but it can also be an important player in the reception of the audience – if they have read or heard about the review before they see the gig. This may sound a bit pretentious but, I guess you asked for it. If you think of a well respected but completely alien act playing in UK for the first time, the previews and former reviews are the guides by which the uninformed audience member can figure out how to get the most out of the performance. I guess it’s a mix between critic as champion and critic as facilitator, preparing the audience for the show. The performance happens between the artist and the audience, but the reviewer can be present in this game because the review, whether they agree with it or not, is part of the experience of the audience member out of which they make sense of the performer’s act. People vomited in the isles at the opening of the Rights of Spring, people called Dylan a traitor for changing his sound, people – including critics – don’t always know a good thing when they see it – because they don’t necessarily know how to make sense of it.

    When you see Huck perform, for example, until the first few begin to loosen up and laugh at his twisted character songs like “Scorned Blues” – the one with the “evil eye” – most of the audience sit there transfixed, not by the genius of the song, but pure incomprehension. If he was to give it an intro it would damage the integrity of the song and probably deliver the audience from the warped world they need to inhabit to get below the surface of the song. http://www.myspace.com/huckmusic not sure if it’s on there.. Or a more pertinent example – if people heard Tamara’s “This My Image” knowing that it is about the relationship between a girl and her estranged father – which I imagine doesn’t always come across easily first time round in a live set – it changes the context of the song, gives the audience a step to reach the higher stuff. I agree that it is the job of the performer to make this as plain as possible without compromising their material – but it’s the sticky journey of understanding that makes the obscure enjoyable – and I reckon it might be the job of the critic sometimes to help people get into the stickiness of the art, so that it doesn’t just wash over them and make them think it’s just “standard singer songwriter fare” [!]..

    Well, that’s enough of that jazz.. This is a thread about the Wheatsheaf gig. I apologize for everything..

    ever yrs Phill

    h

    p.s. and Colin: Thanks man! nice of you to say. I’d love to submit some reviews for your consideration. I get to quite a few gigs about town and would be happy to write them up and join in the choir of Jaba!

  • another matt

    ‘How can a fan whose passionate about a performer put you off.’

    because it is absurd. the girl got a good review. well done to her. it is absurd to come onto an amateur website, which produced by someone because they’re passionate about music and want to write about the good (and bad) things happening in oxford music, and then to insult the guy who has just given a positive review to the artist you like. your behaviour is, in its way, comparable to drunken oasis fans throwing glasses full of piss during the support acts. of course it is off-putting. when the people who listen to an artist, who like an artist, and who are (as i suspect) probably friends with the artist behave in such an obnoxious manner, its has a negative impact on my opinion of the artist.

    broadly speaking, since i’m not a cretin, i’d rather avoid music which is listened to by people who are apparently cretins. given that the standard of discourse from the tpb fans in the comments at the time that i commented was cretinous, it made me suspect that her music is not something i’d like to listen to.

  • colinmackinnon

    Thanks for the support Matt, but the comments on here have actually been pretty mild- I think to describe the responses as ‘cretinous’ is very much on the harsh side. I’ve had a lot worse chucked at me on here, but I’m a tough guy and I can take it.

    I do think it’s odd that Tamara herself was tickled with the review, whereas her fans have taken it as a slating! Very odd. But Beaver Fuel’s last sentence (post 14) is very smart.

  • Joe

    Yes, the reason why I am amused when people get involved in arguments simply to write “boring” or something like that. Often what people write reveals more about the writer than the subject, I perhaps spend too much time concentrating on that sometimes though!

    This has made for an interesting read with some good points.

  • Big Tim

    At the end of the day, a review is about the reviewer’s opinion on the artist. Some reviewers dress it up in different ways, but ultimately the whole point is to say that the reviewer’s own opinion is good, bad, or ambivalent towards the artist. It’s one person’s opinion, and therefore it IS going to be different to many other people’s opinion.

    Local music events, especially some of the more eclectic line-ups run by various promoters, tend to bring together several bands/artists of different genres and standards. So it should be entirely unsuprising that a reviewer might thoroughly enjoy some of the acts, entirely despise others, and go and get some chips during a band they didn’t fancy the look of based on a preconceived notion of that kind of music. I know that my own experience tells me that the acoustic singer/songwriter’s slot on the bill is, in fact, chip buttie and a pint time. I would be the same if Rich slotted an opera singer into the middle of a GTI night, since I freaking hate opera, no matter how talented the performers are.

    I’m not suggesting Tamara falls into the same crater of despair as 85% of other acoustic singer-songwriters, but I know that would be my preconceived idea. Even if I’d been told she was very good I would still be waiting to be impresssed (or eating chips) instead of sitting there with an open mind.

    Sorry, started rambling a bit there.

  • another matt

    actually, i will admit that the comments have improved since my initial comment. but at the time of posting it was dominated by

    ‘While it isn’t easy to understand what Colin is attempting to say in between all the fluffed up ‘creative writing’ rubbish taught on degree courses from two bit former polys, he does make two important points:’

    and

    ‘Those who can — do. T hose who can’t – are critics!

    Keep the creative waters flowing Tamara with your ‘SUPERB’ voice and songs.’

    which most definitely were idiotic.