Quick interview: Secret Rivals

Secret Rivals describe themselves as ‘three boys and one girl who united in 2008 through a mutual love of eighties British indie and scuzzy punk.’ They release their debut single next month.  Secret Rivals

1.What do you think you sound like?

Early Idlewild meets The Cribs meets Sonic Youth, with a healthy dose of Buzzcocks thrown in.

2. What do you do when you’re not making music?

Drink, flash dance.

3. Recommend us a good band or album and tell us what’s good about it.

Captain by Idlewild. The greatest debut EP for my cash: fast, heavy, every song a winne This record was the blueprint for what I wanted my band to be.

4. Where did you get your band name from?

Kung fu films.

5. What do you like and dislike about Oxford and its music? 

I love how the ‘scene’ is so eclectic: you can go out almost any night of the week and be able to check out some live bands and Oxford has decent venues for a small city. Anywhere with the Cellar and the Wheatsheaf right in the centre of town is pretty lucky.

Dislikes: I think I dislike the fact that venues charge promoters so much to put on a gig, leading to higher door prices than other places we’ve lived. I think it puts people off just wandering in from the bar to the music room if they have to pay £6 just to have a look. Plus the outrageous beer prices.

  • colinmackinnon

    Good point about the venue charges, though maybe we can blame the council for the extortionate rents.

  • http://www.myspace.com/smilex leesmilex

    good interview would have liked it longer…this band are one of my (many) favourite new local bands and would like to know what makes them tick! regarding venue charges – since most promoters rent the room off the venue surely it must be the venue charging too much for the room and promoters putting on bands for guarantees that don’t match the bums on seats and rely on supports to draw a crowd. our monthly quckfix night has managed to put four bands on for four quid entry for around five years and pay bands before only recently putting it up to £5 since offering small guarantees to a few bands, so i guess its a case of trying to be smart but fair?

  • Kev

    I dont think venue charges are a problem. Venues COULD offer free space and just charge for the sound engineer but there are so many bands in Oxford now that turn up and dont even pull a handful. Neither the venue or the promoter make money. Thats why door prices are steep. To guarantee they dont anything. Bands should work hard to pull people to a show and it shouldnt be looked on as “they charge so much to hire the venue”. For alot of promoters in Oxford its a job, not only a means of supporting local music by offering bands shows.

  • Jay Rival

    Thanks for reading folks and for commenting, now excuse this shameless bit of self promotion

    http://www.myspace.com/secretrivalsband

  • Andrew

    Yep, totally agree, bands should work hard on getting people along to a gig and we’re not trying to say they shouldn’t have to. However, I think that lower door charges would encourage the people who are just in the pub for a drink to go into the music rooms rather than stay downstairs at the bar. I think people who arent really that involved/interested in the local scene are reluctant to pay £5/6 for bands they’ve probably never heard of, especially if they’ve only arrived at the pub halfway through the evening, but wouldn’t be adverse to paying a couple of quid on the off chance that they’ll see something they like. I’ve been to nights at the Jericho where the music room is relatively empty, but the bar downstairs is heaving. Any way of getting these people upstairs and intersted in local music has got to be worth thinking about.

    Andrew (rivals)

  • http://www.myspace.com/smilex leesmilex

    just wanted to make it clear i do agree bands should try to pull ( i promote so i agree!) i also did not mean to diss the venues, most are pretty reasonable i just meant that since most venues have promoters renting the room its not a direct link to council rentals (though they are extortionate). i guess what i was trying to say is usually most local bands will play for lots less than touring bands who rarely pull enough!
    i did not put this very well and still feel i have not made it that clear but am too busy to spend much more time on it, so just no-one take offence ok and all will be cool! :-) x
    p.s.

  • jamess

    this debate’s gently raged for years now – i used to charge £3 on the door, 20 years ago, so i really don’t think people are being overcharged if they pay a fiver now. i have worked doors on and off for many years, and it does seem to be all or nothing. people are either happy to pay a fiver, or will quibble if you ask as little as a pound. it’s not the amount, it’s just that they want it laid on a plate for free, so they can spend £30+ on booze and piss it against a wall. That seems unfair, but in many ways charging a fair amount for bands filters out the numpties and the people who attend really do want to be entertained.
    bands can go a long way towards making things so much easier for themselves and the promoters by doing their bit to promote their gigs, and try not to do several in the same town every month. Those bands are really appreciated, and , once venue costs are covered, i’ll do my damndest to pay a band apporopriately and generously.

    it’s not a full time job for me – just a wierdit hobby/habit of putting on bands i like and i think would do well for getting a chance to play. i have a proper income elsewhere, so it doesn;t matter if i make money, but i did decide at the beginning of this year that i’d try not to lose money, and i’d not pay bands if too few people attend – i’m not being harsh, but i cannot really afford to subsidise promoting any more.

    personally i very rarely walk into a pub/club unless there’s live music – it’s a major incentive for me, and i’d happily pay for that, and expect bands to get paid for their efforts.

  • Jay Rival

    Promoters have got to charge to cover there costs and/or to pay those bands that demand a payment, its a bloody hard one to crack it always strikes me when i go out in Oxford that thers plenty of ‘sceney’/alternative kids about in the 02 on any weekend that would probably really dig a lot of whats happening in Oxford at the moment i think its about reaching out to them.
    Bands that come from Brookes ect are gonna have a chance to spread the word about there band through the colleges but i think its hard for bands who have moved to Oxford from elsewere cus they have to win there fans by relentlessly gigging and asides from The Cellar thers not many venues with that kind of ready made audience, then on the other hand you cant play to often cus promoters wont touch you but you do need some kind of local fan base…..its a tricky one.
    i think there should be a Brookes uni band liason officer of some kind heh.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Kev said “venues COULD offer free space and just charge for the sound engineer”.

    To be honest, mate, I think you’ll find many of them already do: if you consider the cost of paying engineers, and doorstaff/bouncers (if this is part of the deal), along with costs for upkeep/hire of the PA you’ll find there’s not much left of the hire charge for most of the venues in Oxford to puit in the bank. Some are expensive, but most only charge what bis reasonable to keep the venue running, & hope to make thier profit on the bar.

    I agree with Jamess, I don;t think a pound either way makes much difference to people.

    Anyway, GTI is still only £4, we do our level best ot keep it low, so I trust we’ll be seeing all of you lot on 30/5/09 for our 7th birthday gig – if you don;t come, I’ll know you don’t mean what you say ; )

  • Kev

    All good points. Especially a change in door price isnt going to affect the turn out much at all. If it does ill be very suprised.

    On many occasions ive paid however much to get into a gig. The price does not matter, cause I want to see the band regardless.

    Sounds like people making excuses not to go to your shows…

  • Jay Rival

    It makes no difference to me weather its 3 or 5 quid cus like you Kev i want to see the bands regardless, what i think Andrew is saying though is that it makes a huge difference to the folk sat in the bar downstairs who havent come to see bands and dont read Nightshift so have no clue who the bands are or how good there supposed to be.

    Thats why the Cellar is such a good venue for bands cus they get great exposure and granted that the majority of young folk in the Cellar on a Friday have payed for the DJ and night after the bands they still see the bands and hopefully in the process get turned on to a few local acts that they would otherwise have never seen.

    i remeber when we first started gigging we were really lucky cus the first few bands we supported were similar in age and style to us so we quickly made freinds and got ourselves a bit of an audience but even now if im playing a venue that has a chocker bar downstairs weather were the first band on or headlining ill always try and blag a few tables to come upstairs and check out the bands, some do some refuse to pay.

  • colinmackinnon

    I wonder if flyers help, in the situation Jay describes. Maybe flyers help pique the curiosity of drinkers in the non-band room- sometimes the hard work is getting people to climb the stairs of the Jericho/Wheatsheaf. No idea how price elastic gig-goers are. I wouldn’t pay more than 5 quid for non-name acts, unless it was an all-dayer.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    When we first did gigs at The Zod, we charged £4. If you came to our gig you go to stay on for Boogie Basement for free. Fair enough. BB costed £5.

    So, we used to advertise it to people who went to BB by saying GTI is “3 acts for -£1!”. It still didn’t work! I may be getting jaded & defeatist, but I don’t belive there’s a huge untapped market for live music, that we just need to know how to reach; I think there’s a tiny market for live music that’s well catered for, and a vast number of people who aren’t interested. They may say they’re kept out by price/time/location/age/etc but in most cases these are just excuses, they simply don’t want to know. Once I resigned myself ot this fact, I found promoting much more fun!!

  • Meanie

    PROMOTERS
    It is their job to promote. that is why they choose who plays. I agree if you put your own night on then it is up to you. Otherwise why do promotors keep the door money. So many are s*** in oxford they hire a place out pay the bands nothing and put one little f***g post on nightshift and expect that to be it. So complacent and so s***. either pay bands and expect them to brign the audience or use your f***g door money to actually do your jobs.

    nice one guys/gals.

  • Phill

    I think it’s pretty simple really – the man on the street, the general public (or whatever cliche you want to use) simply doesn’t give a f*** about live music. Gigs could be free and and it wouldn’t improve turnout greatly.

    Jay: there’s a bit of a problem with this statement: “the majority of young folk in the Cellar on a Friday have payed for the DJ and night after the bands they still see the bands and hopefully in the process get turned on to a few local acts that they would otherwise have never seen.”

    The cellar doesn’t regularly put on bands on a friday night – thursday is the regular band night. And then when they do have live music on fridays , it’s usually one band, on about 11 and the main reason it gets busy is cos people want somewhere to go when the pubs shut.

  • Big Tim

    I agree with that Rich. I think some genres of music have fans who are more inclined to go to smaller gigs than others. Rock/metal/punk often has quite a healthy gig-going population who’ll go to any sized gig. If there is a huge, untapped market it’s in the pop end of things. Your average Fox FM/Radio 1/Jack FM type listener will only go to uber-gigs or to larger venues to see mega-bands, rather than go to local gigs.

    The student market is also a lot bigger in Oxford than many people anticipate. It’s a big part of why summer & christmas are poor times for normal gigs (not the festivals though, because they’re the aforementioned uber-gigs!). Higher door prices mean the poor students can’t afford to go, so it does help to keep prices lower in that respect.

    In the last 4 or 5 years I’ve noticed prices at the Wheatsheaf (as an example) go up from £4 to £5, which is insignificant really but there is the psychological effect of not getting change from a note. Seems silly but it does occasionally make you pause for a moment.

  • http://www.joechapman.org/ Joe

    “I wouldn’t pay more than 5 quid for non-name acts, unless it was an all-dayer.” – Colin MacKinnon

    Is £6 really too much to see 3 local bands? Do you really think that there aren’t any local bands out there that are worth seeing for £6?

    Out of interest – as a reviewer do you pay to see bands anyway?

  • http://www.joechapman.org/ Joe

    I’m amazed at people having an issue with paying £5 or £6 to see some bands. It really is a small amount to most of us, we’re not homeless, we’re not living in a third world country.

    What is important here? Spending your money on something you enjoy or saving the money for the sake of it?

    I really don’t think that lowering the price of gigs would attract many, or any, new gig goers. If someone wants to see a band or have a lucky dip night out then that’s exactly what they will do regardless of whether it’s £5 or £6. Just buy one less drink if you are that worried, not unless drink is more important than music. I agree with James on this.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Actually, Colin’s a saint, because he insists on paying to get into gigs he’s reviewing, even if he’s been offered a guestlist spot.

    I, on the other hand, grasp anything free I can get my stinking hands on!

  • http://www.joechapman.org/ Joe

    That’s fair enough. We are all MPs at heart really.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Hello Meanie

    What do you think constitutes effective promotion of a gig? I’m not being defensive, I’m honestly interested. If the answer’s “Fly posting”, then my figures don’t bear out that claim. Any other ideas gratefully received.

    For the record, Rob & I have never taken any money from GTI beyond expenses…altho, unlike some of you, I don’t see that it would really be a crime if we did.

  • Jay

    Out od interest our last ####### gigg was £7.50 entry (no club night just the 3 bands) would everyone be happy with that, some of our freinds who were promised if they said theyd come to see us would be charged £4 actually left at the door cus they felt they were being ‘fleeced to make up for the fact no one turned up for the headliners’

    Note this is not me having a pop at any certain promoter (thats why ive not mentioned the venue) just a case in point that people will walk away if the proce is too high.

    i also agree however that for anyone who is excited to check out a band 1 quid wont really make a difference (well it shouldnt)

  • matt

    people will happily pay £4-5 to get into a club, but won’t pay it to go to a gig. there are two very simple reasons for this. firstly, most people aren’t interested in live music, beyond an opportunity to go and stand in a field and sing along to oasis. secondly, most bands are terrible. i enjoy going to gigs, really, i do. but most bands aren’t very good. i mean, i’m pretty selective in the gigs that i go to, but i’d probably say that when i consider all the bands i’ve played with, or seen as part of larger bills, i’d rather have not seen them. maybe that sounds cruel, but thats how it is. i don’t go and see bands on the off chance they might be good, because its statistically very unlikely. i mean, i’ll listen to bands on myspace and if i like them i’ll turn up, but the reality is that if i was downstairs in a pub and was offered the chance to go and see the bands upstairs for a quid, i probably wouldn’t most of the time, because most of the time they wouldn’t be very good.

    to be honest, what i find most troubling is the pattern that seems to be pretty endemic within live music of bands not watching other bands, and the people that come and see them not sticking around. i just feel like unless you have a very good reason, playing a gig requires a basic minimum of watching the other bands play. it is common courtesy. going downstairs to have a natter with your mates who came to see you is not on. i’ve sat/stood through some bloody terrible bands. i don’t see why others should get away with not doing so.

  • Beaver Fuel

    Jesus Christ. “Most bands are terrible” – Very few bands start out polished to perfection, it’s gigging the toilet venues that gives them the practice and experience to make them good. With an attitude like that it’s a wonder any bands end up getting anywhere. I do, however, agree that it is the lack of interest that is the problem. People are sheep, and that’s why people go to see Oasis – because other people do. The fact that they’re an utterly sh*sorryColin*ite band doesn’t seem to come into it.

  • phill

    No, I agree with Matt here – most bands are terrible. If bands use gigs as practices (as you’ve implied Leigh) then bands can’t be upset when people don’t want to pay £5 to listen/watch them “practice”. Rehearsal rooms are for getting right, gigs are for putting on a show. I’m not saying that when a band first gigs they have to be polished, but at least get your sh*t together enough so that people feel they’ve got their money’s worth.

  • Big Tim

    Phill said: Rehearsal rooms are for getting right, gigs are for putting on a show.

    I agreee totally. Yes, there’s a certain amount of “gig fitness” that you only get through experience of playing live, but that should just be about the periphery of putting on a good show, rather than the ability to play the music live. If you can’t play the songs live you still have every right to be onstage but no right to complain about the reaction to your performance.

    Having said that, there’s no accounting for taste and for performance. I’ve seen plenty of bands who get a great reception and do a blinding gig but who are, realistically, diabolical when it comes to playing their songs. Submerse are a prime example of that – I can’t remember ever having seen them play a bad gig, despite the fact that they’re all out of tune, mashed off their faces and don’t know what song they’re playing or the chords or words to it. Conversely there’s plenty of bands who are entirely capable of playing their songs very well onstage but who are completely unmemorable because they don’t have their stage act together.

  • Jay

    i dont think music works live at all….its just the wrong vehicle for music all together (i joke)

  • Beaver Fuel

    I still stand by my comment about experience and practice, as playing in a rehearsal room is very different to playing a gig. If you play the same rehearsal room every week for 6 months it’s still going to be a very different experience when you play your first gig – various pressures for a start, plus it’s going to sound very different. I’m not saying bands should use gigs as a practice, and I agree they need to be coherent to begin with, but the fact is that gigging will improve your band more than bumming about in a practice room will. How many “good” bands started out a bit rubbish? Probably most of them.

  • Jay

    Sureley no one wants to see bands sounding over rehearsed a band can be tight yet still give you nothing, just as thers plenty of bands that are downright shambolic on stage but put on a show thats amazing.

    Id give my right nut to have seen the Pistols live during the Sid year despite the fact i know the sound would have probably been awful.

    i just wanna see a show! i want to believe a band means it, i can happily forgive a hundred mistakes if the band is passionate and is willing to spill a bit of blood for the audience.

  • http://www.myspace.com/smilex leesmilex

    kudos to secret rivals for hitting on a good pont for debate, but ultimately i don’t think we are much closer to any resolution: the fact remains that we are all the converted and the ones who need preaching to are your average joe in the street who (and trust me as a doorman in ox for over five years) have a problem with forking out for live music, not realising that there is a whole wealth of talent between the free live pub entertainment of covers and standard blues bands and the radio 1 mass airplay league! tim – you are so right about submerse – never been so entertained by shoddiness! and everybody who commented, props to u for a. making good points, b. caring about it all enough to be part of it and think about it constructively! :-) x

  • http://www.myspace.com/smilex leesmilex

    oh yeah, jay – i have got so much better at singing since i stopped spilling blood instead of hitting notes, plus i spend way less time removing splinters of glass from my head after shows these days which leaves time for relaxing with drink/friends!
    it used to be so important to me to set ourselves apart from every other band our audience could see live by putting in ludicrously ott performances but now after 7 years it feels like a.we have little to prove in that respect and more in other areas and b. that the music may have been suffering, in that it was not the most important bit as far as some were concerned and c. some people actually mistook it as fake carnage!
    after all if u had to be one act on the legendary nin/marilyn manson/jim rose circus tour – which would it be? i feel like we have moved up that bill slowly but surely! :-)

  • matt

    when i say that most bands are terrible, i don’t just mean in the sense that they lack stagecraft or whatever (though a lot of them do), i mean in the very basic sense that no matter how well they play it, their music lacks any merit. writing good music is really, really hard. i don’t mean it as a cruel thing. the reality is that the vast majority of people can’t write well. most of the terrible bands i see aren’t bad because they play their music badly (although in a lot of cases that doesn’t help), they’re bad because the very core of their music isn’t interesting. no amount of slickness is going to cover that up; often, it only exacerbates the problem.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    I know you don’t expect me to say this, but I agree with Matt.

    Most music is rubbish. Most poetry is rubbish; most sculpture; most novels; most theatre. Art is really really hard to pull off.

    But, where we clearly differ, is that I find it worth the risk to sit thru something that doesn’t excite me, because sooner or later you’ll find something joyous, and fantastic. And it’s surprising how often it happens if you put the effort in. As an example: altho a lot of acoustic singer-songwriters leave me cold, just think how much smaller my life would be if I hadn’t bothered to go to the 1st John Peel day at The X and discovered Ally Craig. And, no matter how jaded you are, the power of something good never palls. I was standing in the corner of The X with such old hands as Ronut & Mac (“clique!!”), & we looked at each other after a few bars and all said, “This guy’s *good*”.

    Ally’s just an example, & I choose him because he’s never played GTI (purely a matter of architectural logistics!), so this post can’t be confused with self-promotion. But, what I’ve really enjoyed about running GTI for 7 years, is that quite often the acts that turn out to be fantastic are ones that didn’t necessarily set me aflame on paper or demo. It’s worth taking that step into the dark, I say.

    Of course, the other side ot this is: sh*t bands are fun! If you have a mate to snigger about it with, anyway. My ideal night is about 3 good friends, 5 good ales, one fantastic act that makes me want to shake them by the hand as soon as they’re offstage, one promising but flawed act that you can spend a good while dissecting and arguing about, and one godawful fleabitten pile of cack that almost gives you an embolism trying to stifle the giggles. Yay!

  • Jay Rival

    Sounds like a typical Gappy night 3 audience members and 1 good band (if your lucky)

    (i joke…..or do i?)