Hearts In Pencil: Hannibal Ad Portas


It’s already been decided on this site that we all want Hearts In Pencil’s hair. But they’re not just a pretty haircut – they know Latin too. This two track EP is entitled Hannibal ad Portas: ‘Hannibal is at the gates’, an expression of general woe or dismay used by Roman senators when calamity struck (thanks, Wikipedia…!).

You might then expect this EP to be full of ominous doom-saying, rapidly confirmed by the eponymous opening track. It starts with sounds of wild animals, thudding explosions and a sound reminiscent of twisting metal. The singer (whose name is given only as ‘Lozzo’) slurs like a pissed-off Pete Doherty à la ‘Fuck Forever’, spitting venomous lines such as ‘There’s a planet full of Nazis/They’re just waiting for a call.’ The raging lyrics are perhaps overstated, and by the end it sounds like Lozzo is just yelling the first slur against the human race that comes into his head. On the other hand, the instrumentation is fantastic; subtle strings and electronic samples cradle thumping drums and slippery bass, smothered in an ethereal delayed guitar line. It sounds almost like Hope Of The States in one of their more brooding moments. About two minutes in, the track suddenly dives into an Arctic Monkeys/Art Brut-esque upbeat, pop-punky chorus. It’s totally out of the blue but works brilliantly; you can almost picture the confused audience breaking into a euphorically unexpected mosh. The song lingers slightly in places in the middle and could definitely be trimmed down, but it is very accomplished. This is not something thrown together in an afternoon in a shed; you feel the band could barely have poured more love and care onto their own children. The result captures the sound they are going for perfectly; epic, malevolent, unnerving, and something a bit different.

The second track, ‘Bigger Games/Better Days’, is a different kettle of fish. It’s essentially a guitar ballad, featuring a solid bass line and pattery drums. The Libertines influence is pervasive in this track; again, it’s accomplished stuff with a good melody, but you wouldn’t bat an eyelid if you heard it as a hidden track on Up The Bracket. The girl/boy vocal duet works well and adds something to the mix, although it’s a little clumsy in places. The chorus is catchy and (dare I say it) a little bit Kooks-y; it’s certainly of the hands-in-the-air-waving-lighters nature. The track is reworked at the end with the full band (the ‘Better Days’ half) and it works really well; it’s a shame the band didn’t stick with this style from the start of the track and forget all the Libertines tribute stuff.

Both the tracks on this EP are a success. They’re well written, well produced and show that Hearts In Pencil have real promise as a band. However, while they showcase the band’s laudable range of songwriting capabilities, the tracks don’t work well together as an EP. They just sound like they’re from two totally different bands. There’s a lot of great stuff here, but the band needs to find a consistent style. The title track shows them beginning to find an original voice – if this continues, Hearts In Pencil will definitely be a band to look out for.

  • Adam

    It’s not “Nazis” it’s “martyrs”, which don’t really sound like eachother at all.
    which doesn’t bode well in terms of attention to the music, maybe the haircuts were distracting you.

  • http://www.last.fm/music/spiral+25 Joe

    What? Disgraceful! You think that’s bad though? Well, Colin MacKinnon said that our guitarist Chris Monger doesn’t have a beard! Scandalous blasphemy! He has a beard, it’s a fine beard, all ginger and bushy and I won’t tolerate anyone saying that he doesn’t have a beard. OK?

    We made him correct it of course.

  • Kev

    it is reviews like this that were responsible for my loss of faith in Oxford music. there was a review here about 6 months ago i think which tore the band apart. but it was HONEST. since then nothing has changed with this band. two more songs down the line and same slurred out meaningless lyrics and poor guitar work. is there really such a lack of music in Oxford at the moment that reviewers have to glorify obviously poor bands? i agree that the new songs are something different but in no way are they a success. only poor pete doherty imitations. nothing could be less appealing

  • matt

    i have to agree with kev here to some extent. i dont think this band are bad though, they are pretty good in my opinion, however i think that last time you slated them far to much and this time you have over praised them!! and its not like they have got loads better now. (respect to them for having the balls to send another demo in) i think maybe the fact that they played the punt changes peoples opinions, for example i read the reviews of the punt in nightshift and they were all glowing. i didnt disagree with any of the reviews but just felt that they were slightly bias compared to regular reviews.
    i know its an event put on by nightshift but maybe the fact people expect great talent means that they hear it! a bit like the people who want to see ghosts and ufos are the ones who see them!!

  • http://www.last.fm/music/spiral+25 Joe

    I think you’ve all been smoking too much dope, you are getting paranoid and reading far too much into it…

    Chill out dudes!

  • http://www.last.fm/music/spiral+25 Joe

    Yes! Sorry.

  • http://davidmurphyreviews.blogspot.com david

    The 2 reviews are by different writers, though, aren’t they? So suddenly a divergence of opinion doesn’t seem so odd.

    In fact, varying reviews are inevitable, unless you want Colin to tailor all reviews to meet the “house opinion”, like they do in mainstream criticisim (go on, try sending in a bad review of the last Dylan LP to “M0jo” – they won’t print it no matter how well you write). Is that what we want?

    Just imagine if C-Mac ruled the world. Shudder.

  • colinmackinnon

    Yeah, this is Alex’s debut on the site, and a pretty good piece it is. I can’t stand Hearts in Pencil, but plenty of people seem to. Ronan clearly rated them, as he booked ’em for The Punt, and Alex obviously likes his Libertines and gave them a balanced but decent review.

    This site sometimes gets a bit of stick for being overly tough on bands (‘Slasher’ MacKinnon and all that) , so I’m glad groups that bravely submit new work get a fresh hearing, often by a different writer.

  • another matt

    i saw this band recently. they were the worst band i have ever seen. poor songs, badly played; the bassist in particular was all over the shop, and the frontman was pretty infuriating; the whole thing just reeked of misplaced arrogance. shame really, because the guitarist seemed to have some nice ideas.

  • Andrew

    the worst band you’ve ever seen…steady on!

    Hearts were really rather good when I saw them live, looking forward to seeing them again. Have to say I only really noticed the libs influence in a couple of the songs, quite a lot of it was well away from doherty & co. I just wish they’d bin the bass effect pedal…

  • Kev

    and the singer….. no no im only kidding.

    i saw them about 6months ago at the jericho and thought they were pretty good but nothing special. but in no way did the performance justify this review. and people i spoke to absolutely hated them. sorry for yet another harsh comment and i dont mean to slate the band but an opinions and opinion

  • http://davidmurphyreviews.blogspot.com david

    But the review was of the new recording, not a gig they played 6 months ago! I saw them recently, & was singularly unimpressed, but the record might be great for all I know.

    And even if it’s not, I think Alex has written a decent debut review, even if some of us disagree.

  • Lois

    Personally I don’t see the Libertines link here…
    Demo wise I think the title track is a bit confused but you can see a lot of skill there, even if the chorus is somewhat OTT. ‘Bigger Games/Better Days’ has the catchy element to it and I think the female vocals definately add something. I’ve worked out that the synth player is Joe (of Tristan and the Troubadours) and the female singer used to be in Tristan and the Troubadours as well so it’s nice to see young talent combining (even if it makes me feel rather old)
    I saw them live a while ago and it was actually pretty tight, although the bass player seemed to be in his own world.

    With time they could get better and to be honest, I respect them for not doing the same, meaningless dross that a lot of bands are coming out with at the moment…

  • To the man who would be king i would say only one thing

    I honestly think thers a bit of snobbery with regards to young bands who have a libs influence i personally really rate this band and they remind me not just of Pete but i see a bit of Bowie and Idlewild in them as well, yet it seems its fine for a band to sound like a second rate Zep or Guns N Roses.

    Like em or not this band is making a stir from what ive read and the people i spoke to Hearts seem to have been one of the high points of The Punt and they seem to really split opinion which is good at least no one can accuse them of being reviewer freindly safe indie pap.

    Really like the first track on this as well

  • Loz

    wah hay,
    thank you for that last comment. well said.

  • Romulans

    I dont love this band but at least they care about doing something slightly different, and if people either love them or hate them thats awesome, better than being something no one can take seriously and not give the time of day to.

  • To the man who would be king i would say only one thing

    Its alright Loz looking forward to seeing you guys again soon (you were sick at the last 3bm show)

    more HIP/Rivals shows please.

  • Big Tim

    > honestly think thers a bit of snobbery with regards to young bands who have a libs
    >influence i personally really rate this band and they remind me not just of Pete but i
    > see a bit of Bowie and Idlewild in them as well, yet it seems its fine for a band to
    >sound like a second rate Zep or Guns N Roses.

    There’s two reasons behind that – one is that the Libertines were distinctly average but somehow Doherty got extremely famous for being a useless jail-avoiding fuckup of little discernible talent, which makes a lot of people very resentful of them and makes them think negatively of anyone who wants to take a similar approach.

    Secondly, those of us who are a little older have fonder memories of Zep, Roses, etc etc, so will tend to make more favourable comparisons to bands like them, however good the actual band is! There’s also a greater appreciation of the talents of bands like them – whatever the expoits of the band members (and both Zep and Roses were extremely notorious for their off-stage antics) they also were extremely talented musicians, something which is missing from a lot of modern music. Nowadays it’s so easy to make a successful pop tune without the “artist” actually possessing any talent that it’s totally devalued music as a whole. If Doherty can get famous when he can’t carry a tune in a bucket then we’re all screwed.

  • Andrew

    you can’t really criticise up the bracket on those grounds, dohertys fame and tabloid notoriety only really escalated after the libs had split up.

    and since when has playing ability been a definining factor in the ability to write a good tune? If the songs decent I’d rather listen to someone that can barely string three chords together than zep style musical overindulgence. JOhn bonham could certainly drum, but thats no excuse for recording moby dick

  • colinmackinnon

    Half agree with you Andrew. There’s no excuse for Moby Dick, but Doherty’s a talentless tosser.

  • Big Tim

    You missed my point a bit – there’s certainly no requirement to be musically excellent in order to be in a band and write good music. I’m not suggesting there should be a law that every musician passes grade 8 on their instrument before they can be in a band. Christ, punk is one of the best things that ever happened in music and look at that. What I said was that with all the samples, DAW programs and so on around today that it is easy to produce something catchy without having any musical talent whatsoever. And I’m also not against that principle either, but what it does do is devalue music as a whole – if anyone can do it then what does it matter? *That’s* what I object to.

    I also hate the attitude that just because you don’t *have* to be any good at playing an instrument, you shouldn’t bother trying to be any good.

  • To the man who would be king i would say only one thing

    Like Doherty or not (i personally dont rate anything after Brackett) thers no denying the influence he had/has on british music, so ok Libs are probably responsible for bands like the View getting a deal but to say Pete is a talentless tosser well they sound like the words of your average tabloid reader who know Pete the tabloid persona rather than his music.

    C’mon Colin Up The Brackett is chuffing good and you know it.

    youd be creaming over them if they were from Oxford lol.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    I’m in an argumentative mindset today, but I think you’re wrong, Tim.

    “With all the samples, DAW programs and so on around today that it is easy to produce something catchy without having any musical talent whatsoever. And I’m also not against that principle either, but what it does do is devalue music as a whole – if anyone can do it then what does it matter? *That’s* what I object to”.

    A huge percentage of the population can read and write, and have access to the tools and technology to create literature, but I don’t think this has “devalued” poetry.

    I’m not sure it’s possible to devalue music anyway – there’s no exchange rate for art, is there?

  • Big Tim

    But for all the people that have pens & pencils, they don’t all try and write poetry.

    There was program on TV last night about that useless waste of good oxygen Jordan. I caught a few seconds of it while the missus was flicking channels (honest) and it happened to be on a small section about her music “career”. The voiceover said that Jordan was very upset that she hadn’t yet managed to have greater success in her singing career, and they proceeded to show several clips of her “singing” onstage. Truly fucking awful. Flat as you like, awful voice, just horrible all round.

    Why the hell does Jordan think she has a right to a music career? Just because she’s already famous doesn’t mean that she is automatically entitled to a respected career as a pop artist. She. Has. No. Talent. At. It. And just because she wants to sing and release albums, doesn’t mean she’s entitled to any success.

    BUT…

    She *can* release stuff, because she has the cash and someone is preumably willing to take the chance on her and release it. They can autotune the crap out of her voice to make something passable that she’s unable to replicate live.

    There is an exchange rate for art – money, but people are no longer willing to pay any money for art and therfore it has become devalued. New music has no value, everything is immediately freely downloadable as soon as it is released and no-one is prepared to pay for it, or even has to. Most old music has no value either, unless you want to pay for the sleeves & artwork included with a physical copy. Paintings etc are different because there is only ever one original copy which will always have an intrinsic value, but if you don’t want to pay millions for you can just download a free image. Art has been devalued. It is no longer a scarce(ish) commodity that people are willing to pay for, when previously it was.

  • Beaver Fuel

    Gappy, in response to your comment about people who can read or write having not devalued poetry I have two words: Gangster rap. Although admittedly I am crediting a lot of these people with the ability to read or write, despite the wealth of evidence to the contrary…

  • colinmackinnon

    I’m rather with Tim on this- part of me rejoices that people/bands with very little money can make music for the love of it and get it listened to- getting to hearquality recorded music by Stornoway, Message to Bears, Dear City, Captive State is a privilege, and one that wouldn’t have happened without power being wrested from record companies etc., since none of the above acts are signed. And it is technology that has made it possible.

    And yet… Tim is right that there is so much music being made,and the talentless (being the majority) dominate. Technology has made this possible. Another example: Britney Spears could barely stand up during the making of her last record, and yet Autotune and heavy treatment of the voice made a product that was not only releasable, but even rated by the critics!

  • Big Tim

    Yeah, don’t get me wong, being able to produce and record music for very little cash is a blessing and these days there are many talented people who now have access to do it to a standard that would have been unreachable without label backing just 15 years ago.

    But the flipside is that it is now equally available to people who want to have a go but don’t really have the ability, and they feel that they should be equally respected as an artist as anyone else.

    I base my entire career on that principle… :)

  • Big Tim
  • Jay Rival

    You cant have faith in lables or the media to quality control music you just have to have faith in people and hope they will see through the shit (or glossy production)

  • Big Tim

    And sadly the vast majority of the music buying public don’t.

  • Beaver Fuel

    People buy into what they’re sold.
    Kinda ironic that I should twist that statement from a line by a band who chose to call themselves Garbage…

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Well, I don’t want to get in to the debate about whether access technology has affected musicians’ incomes for better or worse – I didn’t realise you actually meant “value” in the financial sense, Tim.

    But, that aside, I think that my analogy still stands. It does seem that, in certain circles, the least artistically interesting, valid works get avidly consumed, be they Jordan LPs or Dan Brown novels. Hey, most people are stupid, and it’s always been the case.

    And, yes, of course, most people in the world are talentless, but I still think that two things (technology making the creation & dissemination of art cheaper/simpler, and the punk eradication of the old boys’ club philosophy that dictated that only people of a certain social standing/age/race/technical proficiency could make “proper” art) have made our world better.

    Now I’ve not heard this Britney LP you mention, Col (tho, if it has “Toxic” on it, it’s fine by me), but the question in my mind is not how drunk/confused/unable she was, it’s how good the record is. If it is good, as you allege critcis have stated, than that’s all that really matters. If it offends your cherished notions of the “artist”, then just scribble out Britney and add the name of the writer/producer/arranger to the CD!

    I’m not saying there’s nothing impressive, or enjoyable, or worth cherishing about technical ability and honed musical skills – on the contrary – but I do think that good music can be made without any of those things, which is also wonderful to me. Jordan singles are a minor unpleasant side effect of this revolution.

    I literally don’t believe that any of you, on hearing a great new piece of music, could justifiably say “I like this, but music has been so *devalued* I can’t like it as much as I would have before Pro-Tools and the internet and Pop Idol”. There’s no devaluation in quality judgments, there’s just more stuff to judge now.

    And Tim, I personally can’t abide The Stone Roses, no matter how much you try to convince me they were “extermely talented musicians” (a paradox to me – I don’t call you a talented artist until you’ve made something I like!). Don’t like the bloody Libertines either, so any discussion about which is more valid or valuable is completely meaningless to me.

    And, actually, if you want my honest opinion, the 1st 2 or 3 Zep LPs are all you need, the rest gets pretty tedious, but that’s by the by.

    A good record, or gig, is good, irrespective of whether it was knocked off in 5 minutes or the result of decades of hard graft.

  • Big Tim

    Can I state for the record that have never, nor will ever, claim the Stone Roses are in any way an acceptable use of valuable time or resources?

    Thanks.

  • Big Tim

    I fear this is a debate that will have to be relocated to a large pub with a bottomless supply of good beer.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    I’m there!

    Tell you what, tho, I’ll drink the good beer, & you can drink that cheap lager shite you seem to favour ; )

  • Loz

    i can respect anyone’s opinion but *cringes* Guns n’ Roses over the Stone Roses, i honestly thought they were a joke for a very long time until people started getting generally excited about that new album, which i did hear and it was totally unlistenable.
    they remind me of the darkness

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Sorry, Tim, I’ve just realised that “Roses” meant “Guns &…” not “Stone”. Well I don’ tlike GnR either*, but I’d have them over Ian brown & Co any day.

    *I don’t like much do I, it appears :)