Tamara Parsons-Baker: Demo

The second half of this demo is noticeably superior to the first.  The vocals are sweeter and far better controlled, the arrangements are neater, the songs are approachable and lucid, and the melodies are flowing without being too intrusive.  It’s very good solid acoustic singer-songwriter fare, and it’s butt-numbingly tedious.

“You’ve Failed” isn’t too bad, being a lightly pretty little confessional that’s a smidgen like Laima Bites’ early recordings, without the sparkle.  “Sore Kara” is a run-of-the mill lament enlivened fractionally by some decent double-tracked vocals, and “This Is My Image” is an anonymous ditty with some off-the-peg blues twiddles, and a frustrating deliberate breathy high end crack in the vocals that is so prevalent nowadays as some sort of signifier of intensity (damn you, Morissette!).  Tamara Parsons-Baker’s voice is sweet and crisp and attention grabbing without being imposing, but it’s singing nothing of any import in the least memorable way.  This is the sort of music to make thoughtless old men in empty open mic bars mumble “She’s not bad” into their slowly supped pints, and the sort of music to depress us woefully at the lack of ambition: before we know it we’re cleaning our keyboard with a retractable pencil instead of focussing on the music.

However, flip back to the start of the CD, and the opening trio of tracks is far more enticing, even though they’re less polished, more awkward, and perhaps not completely ready to be heard.  The tone is bleak, empty and melancholy, and Parsons-Baker’s voice has so much more character, if it perhaps exhibits less control.  “To Possess” is sparse, dessicated and surprisingly hypnotic – there’s not much to it, but it seems to fit together with a cold logic, like a Japanese garden in the dead of winter.  The epic “It’s What We Do”, at nearly eight minutes long, is even more fascinating in its starkness and simplicity, just a spare bass and some guitars which either chime gothically or strum with the heartless efficiency of the executioner’s axe.  The vocal is deadeyed and hollow even as it’s lush and folky, Parsons-Baker managing somehow to sound like a mixture of Nico and Eddi Reader.  The lyrics are pretty generic (and is that really a line about “scrambled eggs”?), but that doesn’t detract overly from the effect. 

“Airs Collide” has a second male voice, and some drums, but just doesn’t quite seem to hang together.  We like the continual two-note ostinato that underpins the verses, but the chorus seems tacked on.  There’s nothing wrong here, but the song lacks the power of the last two, it feels over-egged (scrambled or otherwise).  Somewhere in these opening tracks is a show-stopping voice of defeated souls, and a music of existential doom, although it’s not quite ready yet.  Our advice would be drop the pretty stuff, we’ve heard it a million times; get some properly striking lyrics written; develop the dark, bruising, autumnal delivery; throw the blues fills onto the fire; douse the fire and sit in a freezing garret feeling lonely; listen to some recent P J Harvey and turn of the millennium Nick Cave; weep a lot. That way, perhaps Parsons-Baker could create the sort of music to make sensitive young men in empty attic rooms nod quietly and avoid eye contact over their untouched lime sodas.

Well, we never said there was any fame and glory in this game, did we?

www.myspace.com/tamaraparsons

  • Rachel Metcalf

    I bought this CD at a gig a month back and have been enjoying it ever since. It’s not quite up to her amazing live performance but the songs are f*cking lush! I don’t really like the guy’s voice in Airs Collide – it’s much better just with her. I can’t speak for old men at open mics or introverted geeks in attics, but – as a young woman – Tamara has an incredibly beautiful voice and her songs are fantastically powerful and delicate.

    R

  • colinmackinnon

    I had a quick listen before passing this on to David- I am sure he’s right: the first few songs are more characterful than the latter ones, even if emotionally they make PJ Harvey sound like Victoria Wood.

    But how good is “Japanese garden in the dead of winter”?. I hope Tamara has an eye for a quote!

  • jamess

    pop along to the jericho on sunday 20th to see her live – she’s on at 8.15…..

  • Beaver Fuel

    That’s a great idea Jamess. Anyone would think you had a vested interest.

    Whereas I know that your interests are pants.

  • http://myspace.com/huckmusic Huck

    i sincerely hope this review doesn’t put anyone off seeing tamara live. a demo cd (especially one that’s, what, two years old?) was never going to do her talent justice. see her in person now and it all makes sense, even if it’s not your cup of tea.

    david’s review is diplomatic and all but i don’t know if it’s fair to hold her up against pj harvey. perhaps we should begin by criticising her in the context of the oxford music scene and not via the pantheon of alternative demi-goddesses.

    i believe she has a new demo/ep coming out soon; hopefully that’ll fare better, or at least be more representative of her current ability.

  • Beaver Fuel

    It’s probably true of any predominately live act that a record will not do them justice though, and let’s face it, any studio-based project is a struggle to get to work live!

  • http://davidmurphyreviews.blogspot.com david

    Hi Huck

    I wasn’t judging her against PJ Harvey – not directly, anyway – I just thought that something like “White Chalk” or “The Boatman’s Call” would be an interesting reference point, and perhaps a source of inspiration if Tamara’s not familiar with it.

    I dind’t know the recording wqas 2 years old – but Tamara only sent it in recently, so she must still feel it’s representative in some way. The concept of judging against Oxon standards is interesting. Firstly, I feel that my ears are sadly not callibrated to local frequenzies, so I do find that I judge things in terms of simply whether they’re any good or not, ultimately!

    But, funnily enough, these thoughts were borne in mind. Had I received a CD of tracks all sounding like the less good ones here, the review would have been, “Yes, very nice, a perfectly decent local singer”, but as it is, this review seems slightly more harsh because I want to say, “Well, there’s some stuff here that could be great, even if it’s not quite ready, but I think it’s be wondefful if the greater effort were made to stand out”.

    Obviously, that’s pretty big-headed stuff to come out with, but I am a reviewer, that’s what we do!

  • Joe

    “It’s probably true of any predominately live act that a record will not do them justice though”

    If I understand you correctly there Leigh I have to disagree in that it’s not necessarily that straight forward.

    As ever it’s a combination of what the band or artist wants to achieve and what the listener expects. I don’t think there’s any rule which states a band should sound the same on a recording as it does live. Still, it’s perfectly possible to capture a live sound. For a start – a band could record most of their parts together, even in the same room. That way you can get the best of both worlds.

    Also I find it’s quite nice to be able to do things in the studio that you can’t do live. It’s a fine balance though because some fans of some bands might get used to having something on a record and miss it live. Personally I find it depends on the band as to whether it works one way or not.

    “any studio-based project is a struggle to get to work live!”
    I can see how that can be a struggle in some cases not all and the same rules as above apply in my opinion.

    Take Portishead for example. Years ago, after the success of Dummy I heard an interview with members of Portishead. They basically explained that Portishead was strictly a bedroom project, they never expected to do any live gigs so when they found themselves in the situation where people wanted to hear them live they weren’t sure what to do. Then they just decided to hell with it, why even try to do things like the recordings? So they didn’t. I absolutely loved Dummy and listened to it practically every day but I also loved their completely different live sound. Even the favourite “Sour Times” was played differently, more full on rock thing at the end, different beat.

  • http://www.myspace.com/tamaraparsons Tamara Parsons-Baker

    Thank you for all your comments here. Huck is right, the recordings are about 2 years old and I’m currently working on a new EP, due to be released before the year’s out. This new EP is more representative of my live act and, in short, better.

    Thanks for your review, Dave. Although the CD is old, I’d never had it reviewed. Thanks for taking the time to do it. It was an interesting experience.

    😉 T

  • http://www.myspace.com/tamaraparsons Tamara Parsons-Baker

    And yes, it is a line about scrambled eggs!

    T

  • http://myspace.com/huckmusic Huck

    well, fair points all round, i think. food for thought.

    this demo business is fraught with short-falls and half-measures!

    cheers,
    h.

  • matt scarlett

    iv seen her and thought she was really good and its not my thing at all.

  • jamess

    saw her at the jericho last night – a really good voice, and a deliberate over usage of capo – worrying….then there were lyrics referring to removing of face with razors or summat, shich puts her well above the usual angst ridden snivelling of singer/songwriters!
    so, yarp, really good stuff -enjoyed it.

  • Stu

    Haha

    I told her ‘to possess’ is mint……Did she believe me??..No….What a bally wardrobe

  • Beaver Fuel

    There was something about drawing a figure with tits and sticking pins in the groin, if I heard correctly. Beats any “oh baby I love you” cliche and day!
    Not sure our racket was the best thing to follow her with, but it’s all in the lyrics really.

  • Oliver

    I really think this reviewer should go and see her live as I recently saw Tamara at the Jericho Tavern (having being dragged there by a friend as wasn’t a line up I normally go and see) but thought her performance was scintillating….great songs, good compositional balance. Total crowd pleaser was ‘Real Bad Lover’..good stuff!

  • jimbob

    i’ve had the pleasure of seeing tamara play live a number of times over the last few months. i have also listened to her (2 year old) ep which certainly does not do the current live show justice. she has been trying out new material on the crowd, which is sounding edgy, focused and lyrically striking, and a new set of recordings is on the way. it is clear that her song writing is developing all the time, and this is an exciting prospect for a musician already displaying so much potential. i sincerely recommend getting down to one of her shows, and look out for the new ep!………….

  • phill

    Why is it when someone doesn’t get a glowing DEMO review, people come on here and say “he/she/they are much better live”? This a review of a demo, not a gig, so why compare the two?

  • Henry

    …Probably to show support for the musician who’s work has been unjustly represented, in their opinion, by the unglowing review of their DEMO. A review does not only pass judgement of and offer insights into the thing reviewed but also of the creator of that thing. I think that this review of Tamara Parsons-Baker’s EP was for the most part fair, insightful and entertaining, but I’m finding myself commenting here and now because I don’t want people to think that the above review is representative of her new material, which is in my and many others’ view something quite special. “Butt-numbingly tedious” is just so objectionable to anyone who knows Tamara’s music, especially live, that people can’t help but say something..

    I hope that this goes some way to soothing your incredulity, Phill.

    yrs as ever

    h

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    You’re right, Phill, but I think in this case everybody’s being pretty reasonable. Nobody’s posted “this reviewer’s an idiot, how come they haven’t seen her live?”. The demo was submitted, the demo was reviewed & some people are just offering some further info.

    I would think TP-B will be happy with this page, as we all know that “I don’t normally like this sort of thing, but..” is one of the best comments to get, and none of her admirers are acting like spoilt children like some musicians’ I could mention!

  • Grill

    Now I’m even more excited about Tamara’s set at Three Blind Mice on 30th September at The Wheatsheaf – shameless I know.

  • phill

    If it’s not “representative of her new material” then why send it in?

    Please soothe my incredulity more.

  • Yawn

    i didnt read the review but live?, im sure shes a lot better live and all that but its not the kind of music that makes me wanna drop a load of dodgy Brookes ket and go tear it up live anyway….(yes i only venture out to see bands that compliment heavily cut low quality uppers heh)

    still very nice Radio 2 esque tunes (Radio 2 is the new Radio 1 ive heard so thats no bad thing)

    The above was jest, i actually have seen/played on the same bill as Tamara and it was all very nice.
    A demo should jut be a tool for promoting your live show anyway i reckon (as should all releases until your established enough, then your live shows can be a tool for promoting your product.

  • http://www.spiral25.com/ Joe

    “A demo should jut be a tool for promoting your live show anyway i reckon (as should all releases until your established enough, then your live shows can be a tool for promoting your product.”

    As opposed to just being a tool?

    Well, a demo is a demonstration I think? in which case it depends on who the demo is for. If it’s for getting gigs then yes you are right, it’s just a ‘tool’ for getting gigs.

    It might also be a demonstration of your musical creativity meant for a music publication though.

  • http://www.spiral25.com/ Joe

    “The above was jest”
    I’m glad you clarified that because up until the point you wrote that it was jest I took it to be a disguised swipe at an individual or group of people which didn’t really have any relevance to the review because you were just using the review as a vehicle to vent some kind of spiteful, insulting and arrogant opinion. Glad to know that that it wasn’t anything of the sort and you were just having a laugh. Sorry – sense of humour bypass on my part there.