Echo Boomer in a car (for some reason)

Echo Boomer: You Are

Listening to the new Echo Boomer EP, I have the same feelings as Mark Corrigan watching gay porn.

I realise this assertion may need a little clarification for those unfortunates who haven’t seen all episodes of Channel Four’s Peep Show. OK, the situation is that David Mitchell’s wonderfully fogeyish middle manager has developed a professional crush on his boss, the hyperactively high-achieving Johnston, and rents a DVD of the previously-mentioned genre in order to test out his sexual orientation. The first moments, depicting tastefully bronzed pectorals and rippling oiled biceps lead Mark to exclaim, “ Actually, this is all right… excellent toning…nothing scary here… a little friendly banter in the gym….”. However as the kecks come off, the experiment is abruptly ended: “Woahh. A little too rich for me”.

And that’s pretty much how I feel about ‘You Are’. Growing up hating the music of the Eighties, I and my mates would take refuge from Kajagoogoo, Level 42, Howard Jones and all the rest of those talentless, stupid-haired dickheads by immersing ourselves in seventies Prog, electric Dylan, Eskimo nose-fluting, pretty much anything that wasn’t in the charts. And so eighties revivalists are as welcome to this reviewer as the proverbial jobey in a swimming pool.

And yet, and yet, it starts really well. There are moments, even minutes, when I can tell myself there is nothing scary here. Jonny Race sounds an awful lot like Bono, but the former singer-turned-ethicist sold quite a lot of records, some of them not bad. ‘The Circle’ is tense, well-grooved stadium rock, beginning as economically as a good mid-period U2 single and developing into danceable Franz Ferdinand disco, complete with excellent lead guitar hook. Sam Race’s keyboards are subtle and sly, even conning us that there’s a cello dug in there somewhere. The rhythm section of Paul Wilson and Pete Oliver is tiny-sounding but secure.

But it gets a little too rich for me on ‘Learning to Lie’, which is dominated by the sort of deservedly-obsolete Eighties synths you used to hear on the test card preceding ‘Programmes for Schools and Colleges’  on Tuesday mornings, when what you really wanted was the hours to tick by into Bagpuss or Mister Benn. Awful. Too awful. Oh, and there’s a breakneck crap-rock guitar solo at the end. As Jarvis Cocker might have commented, this is hardcore.

You Are (The One) (Why the Parentheses?) weds the gorilla-drumming of Phil Collins to some more hideously un-ironic synthesiser hoots, whose unholy union should have brought the church ceiling crashing down on bride and groom, if there were any divine justice on this earth. It’s a bit of  a shame as Race’s vocal melodies and tone are quite easy on the ear. We don’t have so many good vocalists in Oxford that we can afford to see this one waste his talent on cheesy throwbacks to what was a grim, charmless and heartless period for pop music. He needs to tell his brother to ditch the Bontempis, listen to some Grizzly Bear if he wants to learn how to deploy old keyboards effectively, and write some new songs that sound like they vaguely come from this century, rather than the worst decade of the last.

Echo Boomer Myspace

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Ronut is on holiday, so I’ll get in there on his behalf: anyone who says the 80s were the worst decade for music is deaf, lazy or hidebound and unadventurous (or perhaps the sort of person who can see *any* merit whatseoever in the risible guff Dylan released in said decade, hmmm?).

  • http://www.myspace.com/theprohibitionsmokersclub leesmilex

    enjoyed reading this review as felt similarly (if less unfavourably maybe?) when i put them on a while back: good song craft, great individual contributions and loads of talent on display but somehow adding up to something that i could not commit to as much or like as much as i expected, like r.e.m or something similar!
    on the subject of the 80’s: the justification for the whole decade is prince who shaped most music to come…

  • Ronan

    Like what Gappy said. Judging the 80s on those three acts is like judging the 60s on The Move, Scaffold and Val Doonican, or the 70s on Paper Lace, Showaddywaddy and Darts.

  • colinmackinnon

    Nahh not having it. Popular music in the sixties was good. The Beatles weren’t just critically acclaimed, they sold stacks of records- same with the Stones and even Dylan. Popular music in the 80s was diabolical- just look at the rubbish lineup that was put together for Live Aid. IN the Eighties you had to become a boffin to find good stuff.

  • Ronan

    Yes those bands sold well in the 60s, but so did Cliff Richard, Val Doonican, Dave, Dee Dozy, Beaky Mick and Titch and The Seekers, while the Velvet Underground, Stooges, Silver Apples, Can et al were very much underground concerns.

    Yes Live Aid was a musical abomination, as were so many of the godawful post-New Romantic and plastic soul bands like Kajagoogoo (who only had 3 Top 10 hits, remember)and Level 42. But would anyone in the 80s really have had to dig so hard to discover Prince, Pixies, The Smiths, The Specials, Public Enemy, Madonna, Soft Cell or Metallica? To name but a very few. And would you really have wanted to sit around listening to Yes, ELP and Rick Wakeman over those?

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    C-Mac

    Your chart knowledge is a bit wonky, I’m afraid. The Beatles are an exception, there was nothing like them before & there will never be anything like them again (I’m talking cultuirally, I’m not going to claim they’re the greatest musicians in human history), but apart from their conrol the charts in the 60s were, on average, as atrocious as in the 80s.

    Go on, check your 50s charts, you’ll surprised to find that Carl Perkins wasn’t in the Top 10 every week, it was the cast of My Fair Lady, and Acker Bilk or whatever. Yes, there are plenty of Elvis hits…but then again, after the 1st couple of years, Elvis was as much a plastic pop act as Pet Shop Boys (I love both acts, as it happens, so don’t write in).

    Also, in the 70s and 80s exciting new underground movements had chart impact: I need hardlyn mention punk singles, but think of Jolly Roger’s “Acid Man”, “House Nation” by Housemaster Boyz, any number of great hip hop records, and a fair smattering of thrash. Yes, there were chancers and watered down efforts too, but the real deal got public approval. Where are your dubstep anthems or your wonky tunes or your hypnagogic swoons in today’s charts?

    In short, you lived thru the 80s. Had you listened to every hit single from the 60s or 70s, you would soon conclude that popular music in those decades was crap too. The real lesson here, of course, is don’t judge any era’s music on the tracks they play on day time radio…

  • Jay

    ‘i got love for you if you were born in the eighties…the eighties’

    big love for 80’s and i know its now bcome the ‘cool decade’ because of bands like Bloc Party, Interpol, Late Of The Pier, XXX, Chew Lips all wearing its influence on there sleeves but you cant argue with Pixies, Cure, Depeche Mode (no not soft cell!) Joy Division, The Smiths ect…..(forget the fashion show that was the ‘madchester’ scene towards the end of the decade..the only good thing to come from that was Tony Wilson (Stone Roses were good for about 5 mins in a ‘pychedicic furs’ kind of way before they turned in to bloated coke heads however Happy Mondays/Inspiral Carpets ect were always pap…and as for New Order!)

    the 90’s has got to be the worst decade for popular music…euro dance and the god awful 60’s revival in indie (oasis anyone?)…saying that time will tell on the LA’s

  • http://www.smilex.co.uk leesmilex

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! this debate sucks so bad, but…
    dude! what the fuck? 90’s = shit?!
    if not for the 90’s i shudder to think what i would be doing – or this whole oxford music scene really!
    what would oxford be without the success (in varying degrees) of ride, radiohead and supergrass etc?
    or even the way the scene was back then – not just a bunch of opportunsitic friend-careerists but a bunch of people united by a common sens e of purpose and inspired by the fact it was obvious to see that music starts with three chords and a bit of attitude! i would have thought that would be something u could empathise with?
    nirvana – most important thing to happen to me in my teens
    gangsta rap – the single most culturally important and dangerous form of music ever invented
    britpop/rock (not dadrock) – a whole bunch of britsh bands proving usa did not have all the chops always!
    dance culture really taking off and becoming the hugest new ingredient in popular music since r&b beats!
    fuck dude there was a point when people were buying tricky as coffee table music (yes, it frustrated me at the time but now i would welcome it!) the fucking prodigy, their law and the criminal justice bill issue!
    add to that the rebirth of nu-soul in the states erykah, d’angelo
    oh yeah and there’s the rise of industrial to the point where marilyn manson becomes commonplace in the mainstream – along these lines the mass acceptance of weed via bands like cypress hill etc
    this decade has been a fucking wash out of retrospective pant wetting and lack of any reflection of the world we live in sociopolitically (aside from the fact these are the blandest of times in every way possible!)
    the 90’s werelike the sixties without the naivety and they pissed on the 80’s so badly for a while it seemd bon jovi may not be back ever…these were important times – in fact it’s the decade the business learnt to turn around new fashions and replicate them in a safe mainstream way in weeks so it was effectively the last time anything mainstream was honest…shit, its figurehead blew his brains out when he realised what he had become… it was a time of people trying to mean and live by what they said i believe.
    it was the last time we had real stars that brought anything really fresh to the game outside of a few notable exceptions this decade has been a starless red carpet walk of mundaneity and whoring for small change!
    i feel myslef becoming less coherent and more ranty but i would say for mainstream music the 90’s was great!
    and back off all those of you who are going to diss the mainstream bands cos they are the doorway to the trendy alt underground shit we all love now: almost nobody goes straight to the pixies and sonic youth but back in the day nirvana turned all that shit around so the playing field levelled in a good way not like a big flood of shit which is what the supposed revolution of the internet has done – widened the gap i believe!
    i cant be bothered to list much more i think u get my point but don’t diss the 90’s they were fucking ace!
    back then u really thought u could get somewhere and make a difference doing it – yeah it was bullshit because the man always wins but we knew that from the 60’s anyway – does not mean it shouldn’t happen regularly! :-)x

  • Ronan

    But Lee, Pixies a were fully established successful band before Nirvana championed them: top 5 albums, A Reading Festival headline set etc.

    Sadly, following your logic I can’t quite see Susan Boyle fans discovering Dusty Springfield, or Ronan Keating fans going back to unearth Scott Walker.

  • Jay

    Lee i kind of agree with a lot of what your saying (rap emerged in the eithties though..gangsta rap and west coast you can keep…vile stuff
    and Metal remained big throughout the eighties into the 90’s i dont think the scene became anymore mainstream (just a tad less camp and more glam rock influenced…which again is hardly ‘the new sound’)

    i do strongly believe all the 90’s indie you mentioned is just rehashed 60’s and 70’s riffs, there was a sence that anyone could make it big but the same happened with punk in the 70’s a few bands made a difference and sold records so then every record exec in town woul sign avaery half bit punk copiest band on the scene…(for every clash thers 20 other god awful 70’s punk bands that jumped on the bandwagon) ….i think the same happened in the 90’s Supergrass, pulp, Blur (even oasis i can understand) deserved there label places and radio 1 spots but then the whole scene gets over saturated with the likes of Northern Uproar,Hurricane #1, Echo Belly, Lush and (sorry) Ride, bands who wouldnt be touched if it wasnt for the success of the likes of Oasis. (honestly go back and listen to your early 90’s ‘shine’ mixtapes…its as bad as listening to a best of 70’s punk (2 good bands and load of bandwagon jumpres and label made acts.
    at least the 80’s saw a change in direction in hw music was produced…the 90’s just dug up George Martin re opened Abbey Road and carried on were the 60’s left off.

    what?
    i do love you though Lee x

    i think we can all agree that pop musoc was awful in the 90’s (steps, boybands, brit ect…)

  • Ronan

    Sorry Jay but Ride preceded Britpop by a good three or four years. They’d had 3 albums out before `Definitely Maybe’ was even released. To be honest without Ride there would never have been Supergrass.

    A little bit disengenious to lump them in with Hurricane#1 really, given Andy Bell formed H#1 well after Ride split.

  • http://www.junkiebrush.co.uk Big Tim

    You’re all wrong. Popular music starts and ends with the Monks.

    Everything else, ever, is a pale imitation.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Boyle fans might not discover Dusty, Ronut, but Duffy fans might.

    If they’re *very* lucky they’ll discover Stephen “Tintin” Duffy by picking up the wrong CD, and then they’ll know some quality 80s, 90s & 00s pop music!

  • http://www.smilex.co.uk leesmilex

    ok so maybe my bit up there was a bit fast written and reactionary with slightly rose tinted views but as a defence i first fell in love and formed first bands during the early 90’s (now i think of it late 90’s was pretty dump for guitar music!) also i would like to extend an apology to echo boomer who are probably really pissed off at most of the responses to this article being sod all to do with them – i remember hating a nightshift review of stroppy my 90’s funkrock (yeah we were well trendy during britpop as you can imagine)
    band for going on about living colour for a whole paragraph assesing them rather than us because we liked em!
    but to respond so as not to be rude to the responses to my response:
    ronan – good point about pixies but as a almost entirely mainstream listener who thought reading festival was held in a leisure centre when i first landed back here in uk in 92 i had not heard of any alt rock bands like pixies, janes, alice in chains, soundgarden etc etc until nirvana took over the world , not everybody in the world was lucky enough back in those days to have all the resources to discover alternative and indie that we have now thanks to the internet! the music in s.a. at that point were album giants like beegees direstraits u2 (god the early 90’s were so good even u2 were interesting!) police, genesis, queen, ub40 etc etc. i owe everything to gnr and nirvana and some mates with jimi, doors and marley tapes (yes, cassette tapes!). :-)
    i think sometimes the indie crowd of the uk does not know how lucky it was to have access to the alternative!
    i agree with gappy abou the duffy – dusty bit and also did not really mean pop pap, i meant catchy rock but now i think of it thre are many classics people will get to know and hopefully prefer as a result of shit pop like xfactor hopefully lauching a few hundred jeff buckley enthusiasts tho probably not leonard cohen fans.
    plus i wonder how many people know greats because of a lame cover that turns them on to the soulful original?
    not that that was my point really…
    leading me onto jay (love you to btw!) actually love a few take that songs (sure, why cant i wake up with u) and think of them as pop soul classics (i.e could have been by rkelly or blackstreet etc) and likewise really think the first two spice girls albums, about one solo single each and two tracks produced by jimmy jam and terry lewis (alexander o’neal, sos band, janet etc) are fucking great examples of pop writing/production.
    add to this the first few five (or five-ive as i like to call them singles, cleopatra and even bewitched! i am sure there are other one-offs like fierce and honeyz and early sugababes that one can argue this for too!

    so u don’t like anything by ice-cube, snoop, dre, nwa or any other gangsta rap – shame on u! mising out on so many classics – eighties rap was in its infancy and nowhere near the sophistication of 90’s g-funk – and with a few notable exceptions in the 80’s was almost run the same as motown so way less individual/personal. i hate the way that people will big up johnny cash but not ice-cube – i see less to excuse about his lyrical murdering than ice cube’s or most young black men of that era,and nick cave probably wont suffer anywhere near the insults that gangster rap will on local boards in spite of his killing bitches for a whole album! :-)
    maybe i am just lucky enough to have lived in semi-poor l.a. during the early 90’s (not knowing much rap but being friends with a gangsta’s little bro and having to wear ‘colors’) to see all storytelling as valid!

    metal was nothing in the 80’s compared to the 90’s, maybe you are too young (lucky!) to remember how bad mtv rocks was before grunge/alt took off! – also lots of good bands started in the 80’s only got their due in the 90’s! as for britpop also rans – quite a lot of dump to be sure but also some great also rans- mansun 6 is amazing and i liked menswear – in fact i liked a lot of britpop singles as it goes even some shed 7 yeah its not aged too well but not much does really unfortunately and being honest i regret saying that but i am trying to be honest – a lot of those you mention are dadrock era as far as i am concerned and part of all that weller worshipping bollocks! the britrock i refer to is therapy?, skunk anansie, feeder, terrorvision and that stuff!
    agree with the good stuff comes lots of balls but that has always been the way really everywhere anytime :-)

    and lastly i dont think recycling of riffs etc is a criticism worth levelling or we’d all be stuck on robert johnson or something never updating or freshening up a sound to be relevant now – i once had a conversation with someone who said ‘i only like music i’ve heard’ which, whilst being a illogical argument, i think somes up the role recognizability plays in popularity and since there are only a limited amount of chords etc it’s all about new context and fresh feel!
    oh yeah one thing that really bugged me during the 90’s was the awful pop reggae that dominated charts! also the way that all those britpop songs you think were no.1 were actually beaten to the top by some novelty pop!

    sorry echo boomer and sorry if my critique came off as up my own bum or out of the blue, no harm meant! :-)x

  • http://www.myspace.com/echoboomeruk peteechoboomer

    Pete from Echo Boomer here – remember them? Just to say thanks for all the input and review – all comments gratefully received – we didn’t set out to join the elecro bandwagon (see ‘new’ Hoosiers awful single) just playing what we like at the moment. It’s good that there’s a forum for this stuff and local music can get pushed in all directions from people making the effort to listen – we’ve had more hits on myspace this week from this
    site by miles, so thanks to all for clicking. Lee – it’s been 2 years since we played
    for you – can we come down again if we play ‘Spoonman’ for old times sake?….Spread the word…

  • http://www.smilex.co.uk leesmilex

    hey pete! hope life is good! was it really so long ago? time flies! have not been putting gigs on at the sheaf for around a year now since joal slapped my brother at a quickfix night but will be happy to put your name onto promoters i know! :-)x

  • jonnyechoboomer

    Hi guys

    I’ve just read all these responses and I’d like to thank everyone involved for a really good debate!

    I just want to say that we never intended to sound 80s, it’s just that 2 of us grew up in the 80s – the first records I remember my Dad buying were Hounds of Love and Scary Monsters. I think it’s just that we were drawn to particular keyboard sounds that perhaps someone who grew up in the 60s or 70s would run a mile from. As for the Eye Of The Tiger comparison – I never once thought of it like that, I was trying to do a 50s ‘surf’ thing. I guess that’s what you get from growing up in the 80s!

    Colin, I think if you came to see us live we could win you over!

    Jonny