Quick interview #6: The Scholars

 The Scholars say they’re ‘five scholarly gents who united through an appreciation of music in all its forms’ and play tonight at The Jericho with Manpoints.

1.What do you think you sound like?

As Colin Mac has pointed out on the site, our sound is fairly similar to Editors, Interpol and some of our favourite New Wave bands from the eighties. While the post-post punk and White Lies-esque production gloss is there, we are moving more towards a more eighties sound and are planning to buy a load of new gear and synths to push our keyboard love.

2. What do you do when you’re not making music?

We study full time and have fun whenever we can – this is partly an answer to question 4.

3. Recommend us a good band or album and tell us what’s good about it.

We’re big fans of Glaswegian alt rock outfit The Cinematics and their debut album A Strange Education. The band have been unfortunate enough to be dwarfed by Franz Ferdinand due to their location when they are, however, far superior. The album’s honest attitude towards genuinely good tunes makes their debut charming, endearing and definitely worth a look: it shames the superficiality of more exposed acts.

4. Where did you get your band name from?

We’ve always found the process of choosing a band name interesting and boring at the same time – while it’s completely arbitary on the one hand, it is of course one of the most important elements which goes towards presenting an overall image. While ‘The Scholars’ isn’t exactly groundbreaking, we feel it demonstrates that we are just a bunch of normal kids who have to study first and rock out second. We’re also very proud to represent Oxfordshire when we play away from home and our ‘scholarly’ tag works well with the classic image of an academic Oxfordian to give us what we hope is our bookish appeal.

5. What do you like and dislike about Oxford and its music?

We love the warmth and locality of Oxford and how it is a thirving community in its diversity. We find that we’re always welcomed to the city so warmly and it doesn’t present the daunting challenges that Birmingham does, for example.

On the down side, however, we sometimes feel that the city is very sheltered and because the music scene is so hectic, it is difficult to pick up on big audiences and sometimes opportunities seem few and far between.

  • Kev

    just a load of posh boys making average music

  • colinmackinnon

    Thanks for that, Kev. A 100% sweep I make it of slagging off every band that gets mentioned here.

    Couldn’t you push off and do something more constructive? Knit a sweater or start a stamp collection?

  • http://le-referencement.net/artists FridrihLop

    Good article, the advertisment is sold?

  • Kev

    i run BSM i think i know what im talking about

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    What’s being a driving instructor got to do with it?

  • matt scarlett

    “Thanks for that, Kev. A 100% sweep I make it of slagging off every band that gets mentioned here.”

    I do infact recall kev saying he would have liked to have seen the scarletts playing at the punt! although he never said he liked us, maybe he was just planning to throw bricks at us!

  • William

    I like to think Kev BSM wouldnt be that harsh

  • phill

    “just a load of posh boys making average music”

    And so were radiohead when they started and look what happened to them

  • http://www.myspace.com/thescholarsuk Tim Mobbs

    While ‘Kev’ is entitled to his opinion that our music is ‘average’, I fail to see how being ‘posh’ is an area of criteria that can be criticised.

    With 4 out of 5 of us being state educated (should it matter anyway?) I worry that in our attempt to present ourselves as articulate and approachable, as opposed to the wave of ‘lad rock’ bands who wouldn’t give you the time of day and would rather get hammered at the venue than play well, we have given off a bad impression? I would be interested to hear your views on this as I am interested to see how we present ourselves in terms of first impressions etc. Thanks.

  • To the man who would be king i would say only one thing

    “Thanks for that, Kev. A 100% sweep I make it of slagging off every band that gets mentioned here.”

    Not true really he didnt slag off Secret Rivals, Smilex, or From Here We Run…

  • Nev

    This self interview is overly verbose and utterly pretentious. Having a grasp of the English language is great, but describing yourself with the air of Will Self at a literary festival does not impress anyone!

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    Absolute nonsense, I’m afraid, Nev.

    It is a sad day when somebody giving perfectly decent answers to questions (answers they were explicitly invited to give, incidentally, with no restrictions on length or style) is accused of being florid, loquacious or even (the worst crime, apparently) posh, just because they have some basic facility with the language.

  • Big Tim

    It’s OK everyone – Kev & Nev are having problems with some of the longer words in the interview, and it’s only natural that they would feel threatened and intimidated by someone of normal intelligence.

    Give them an ice cream each and sit them in the corner, they’ll feel better soon.

  • To the man who would be king i would say only one thing

    ” loquacious ” i dont even know what this means thats how much of a rockstar i am lol.

  • http://www.myspace.com/thescholarsuk Tim Mobbs

    Thanks for the comments – they are all very useful.

    I’d like to think the answers were well constructed as I actually care about things like this. Yes you can call me whatever you want, but as an English and languages undergraduate I take my English seriously. Taking this into account, a member of The Decemberists I am now. I’d say that using colourful terminology such as ‘verbose’ and ‘pretentious’ would make my answers… verbose and pretentious; as far as I can tell my answers are devoid of such flowerly language.

    Tim

  • http://www.myspace.com/thescholarsuk Tim Mobbs

    *Decemberists I am *not.

    On the subject of typos, I have just noticed ‘thirving’ which should be ‘thriving’. Oops!

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    I spotted that, but I let it go ; )

  • http://www.spiral25.com/ Joe

    “Yes you can call me whatever you want, but as an English and languages undergraduate I take my English seriously.”
    Elitist! Grammar National Socialist! etc… 😉

    I am really pleased with kev, simply for the accolade of having him slag off my band in a funny manner on more than 1 thread including a completely unrelated thread. The fact that kev seems unable to give any real constructive criticism is far more interesting than the actual content of his posts.

    Vote Kev on June 4th, capture the ferret that is loose on Hollow Way and don’t let the government win! Glasvegansnost.

  • http://www.bsmrocks.com Kev

    Just had this thread pointed out to me on Twitter and thought I should say that it wasn’t me posting on here before. I’m afraid the other Kev is some sort of weirdo fake, which is kinda flattering, in a scary sort of way.

    That’s all

  • http://www.myspace.com/thecinematics Tim Mobbs

    That really is interesting – and actually answers some questions.

    A friend of mine in Manpoints! was shocked to see that a supposed head of a record label could be so apparently unprofessional and suggested that whoever it was was simply lying. Looks like I should trust those Leamington people more often.

  • http://www.last.fm/music/spiral+25 Joe

    The thing that gave it away to me was everything, for a start, Kev can spell his own name properly, the other “kev” took his time working that one out.

  • Ranjan Kale

    I do not understand this band. Not to say that they are rubbish I think its kind of okay but there is just something about it that when I listen and I have to turn it off after a minute. Hold on a second. Its only smugness. And we all love the smell of our own farts in Oxford dont we boys!

  • http://www.myspace.com/thescholarsuk Tim Mobbs

    Smug how, Ranjan? Like I mentioned before I’m trying to keep tabs on what people think of us from stuff like this. As is the label.

    There is certainly an element of fabrication on my part to represent all five of us in ‘interviews’ like this. Is that it? and of course an element of trying to appear to be relatively cool when I am obviously quite the opposite!