Grant: Skirr (Big Red Sky)

“Yeah, it’s a great start, boys; so, when’s the real singer going to finish it off?”

A smidgen harsh, we’ll admit, but Skirr is an LP that has clearly had lots of thought and expertise poured into its creation, but which falls down for us whenever the vocals start. It’s a praiseworthily varied record, impossible to sum up in a pithy description, but sophisticated electro goth would be the closest we could get to swiping at the truth in a snappy soundbite, and we really, really want to like it more than we do. But we don’t, and sometimes you just have to admit these things straight.

The opener “Null” is a brief burst of Future Sound Of London garnished with a snatch from “Never Can Say Goodbye” for no obvious reason, but thereafter “Exeat” sets the tone for the record, with chubby Eighties bass and a portentous vocal line occasionally exploding into hissing guitars, leaving a slight aftertaste of Psychedelic Furs. Elsewhere “Isthmus” (blimey, Grant, is this a tracklist or a championship game of Scrabble?) is a dark-hearted ballad dusted with synth oboe, loosely recalling Depeche Mode’s Violator, whilst “Acres To Hectares” is an improbable industro-rock rave up from 1990 with a caffeinated baggy beat and some wobbly keyboard squiggles suspended between the first flushes of techno and Radiohead’s Amnesiac, all underpinning a tune that surreally threatens to morph into “It Was A Very Good Year”. This is nothing if not eclectic and adventurous recording!

For the most part the music is highly intriguing, if perhaps evidence of too many dips into the Pick ‘N’ Mix counter of recent rock history, and there are only a couple of truly duff tracks: “Below The Seal” welds outdated guitars onto an Isaac Hayes conga rhythm, something in the manner of a blaxploitation theme as envisioned by the Sounds staff in 1988 – horrible, in other words – and “Shellac Skin” is a heavy, doomy trudge over a finger-in-ear folk club vocal melody about addiction that ought to be blackly imposing, but just sounds silly.

This is a collection of ear-catching oddments crying out for a great voice to bind them together, and if Scott Walker were to add his creamy voice to this grab-bag of neat ideas and production tricks it might really work; if Bryan Ferry were to drape a few louche vocal takes over the top it might be pretty fascinating; hell, even if someone who can’t really sing but who has a grasp of storytelling and drama, such as Jarvis Cocker, were to hove into view we’d love this LP. But, sadly, Grant isn’t any of these – in fact, he sounds much more like Russell Senior’s wayward vocal attempts on Pulp’s misfired second album, Freaks.

Let’s cut some slack, Grant doesn’t have a bad voice at all – you could imagine him fronting some grown up indie band, on Pink Hedgehog Records or somesuch – but he doesn’t have the gravitas or depth to his singing to pull off this rich confection. The closing track, “Scent & Snow” a simple piece of pop euphoria that sounds like the work of a band locked up for five hours with their management shouting “Write a hit!” through the keyhole, perhaps encapsulates the paradox of Skirr: it’s not a particularly good song, although it is bouncy enough, but Grant’s vocals work so much better in this unfettered environment. Just when we’re having fun, the record ends with over ten minutes of a single slowly oscillating keyboard tone, infuriating and fascinating in equal measure. Come to think of it, Pulp did this too, at the end of This Is Hardcore. But they’d learnt not to let Russell sing by that time, of course.

Grant Myspace

  • Fizzywig

    Oxbands is rapidly starting to make Nighshift look a like a paragon of positivity

  • jamess

    i’m really enjoying the reviews, and what’s written here is enough to make me curious – i’ll have a rummage on webbysite to find out more.

  • colinmackinnon

    Don’t worry, Fizzy!

    Friendly reviews of Clochards and Relationships to come in the next week or two.

    Recently: Minor Coles, Vibrationic and most of Charlbury has been highly positive: FLM were happy to use their review in their promo material- I think its pretty balanced at the moment.

  • Jay Rival

    We were more than happy with our recent review (i do always feel any band that uses feedback get called Sonic Youth esque wether they sound like them or not (and it does make me wonder exactly what Youth albums the reviewer has actually listened to but hey thats just a personal nit pik and its no bad thing to be compared to those kinds of bands, i suppose it shows the reviewer is strruggling to find a comparison which HAS to be a good thing these days)
    we were gutted The Slasher didnt take it though!

    Oxbands reviews are a great read, the more brutal the better! (also really like the interviews as well)

  • Platesmasher

    As jamess more or less said a lot more snappily, a negative review (and I wouldn’t entirely call this one) can be as good publicity as a glowing one as long as it piques the reader’s curiosity, which this did for me. I’d have thought that being called Grant was a greater deterrent myself, but hey…

    (Listening to the ol’ Myspace now – blimey, it’s a synthier Chameleons! Which is A-OK by me, though I’m not wildly fond of the voice either, but digging the rest and the listed influences are intriguing)

  • http://www.witchesband.com Martin – Witches

    Just remember – a review is one person’s opinion …

    The album isn’t on MySpace (something I am sure that Grant will address shortly) – but it is available on Napster, iTunes, Amazon.

    Oh – and Grant is called grant because – erm – that’s his name.

    Looking forward to other Big Red Sky artist reviews

  • http://davidmurphyreviews.blogspot.com david

    There are three tracks on the myspace from the CD – & they;re the best ones too, I’d say. Yuo’ll all be listening to them thinking, “Oh, he’s such a meanie”.

    Things is, I reckon there are four ways to dislike a piece of music

    1. Something that is so awful you burst out laughing and just want to tell everyone about it in the world so that they can agree how utterly horrendous it is, and the you all go down the pub chuckling about it.
    2. Something that is so awful you want to track down those responsible and hurt them until they understand they must never do this again, ever, and you want to warn the world away from the danger of listenig to this music..
    3. Something that comes on the radio, or what have you, and you don’t like it, and your brain just filters out that information, and later you couldn’t even describe what it was about the music you hated. You can listen to these review CDs 10 times over & not be able to recall anything except a sense of listlessness.
    4. Something, like this album, that you just can’t get a grip on, that you just can’t *like* even though you know there’s nothing about it that upsets you.

    So there you go, I only dislike it in the nicest possible way ; ). Also, I don’t know much about Grant, but Martin & Rex have been involved in some of my favourite Oxford music in the last five years, so I’m as surprised as you that I don’t get it!

    I’m not a rabid slavering Pulp fan either, in case you wondered, they just kept springing to mind that day, for some reason.

  • grant

    Well,that told me,didn’t it?

    So, before I have the brass neck to write a song and craft a sound with my two compadres or-god forbid-open my mouth in front of a microphone once again I will try and remember this.

    But not for long.

  • http://www.gappytooth.com gappy

    You might prefer to remember that submitting a record for critical review may result in a negative response, then you won’t have to – God forbid – get all defensive ; )

  • grant

    OK – fair point,well made. I’ll shut up now.